RefusedDecided 02 January 2020Fingal County Council

F19A/0528: (i) Construction of a two-storey, with single storey element to rear, flat-roofed building to accommodate 1 no. one-bedroom apartment and 1 no. two-bedroom apartment at ground floor level (each served by private garden to rear) and 1 no. three-bedroom apartment at first floor level (served by 2 no. balconies located on the north-west and south-west elevations); (ii) Provision of new shared vehicular & pedestrian accesses off Barnwall Court, 4 no. car parking spaces and 4 no. cycle parking spaces; and, (iii) Landscaping, boundary treatment, SuDS water drainage and all ancillary works necessary to facilitate the development.

Site to the rear of No's., 3-4 Castleview, Balbriggan, Co Dublin
DecisionRefuse permission
Decided02 January 2020
Application typePermission
Source documents13

Site

What is on file

3refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Residential Amenity

Overdevelopment of site due to internal overlooking, substandard storage, poor bin storage location, opaque glazing, and excessive vehicular manoeuvring near living areas, contravening the RS zoning objective to protect residential amenity.

Fingal Development Plan 2017-2023 (RS Zoning Objective)
The proposed development by virtue of the overlooking which will occur within scheme, the substandard provision of dedicated storage, the location/provision of bin storage within the site, the provision of opaque glazing serving bedroom accommodation, the extent of vehicular manoeuvres which would occur to the front of the site... would constitute overdevelopment of the site, provide an unacceptable level of amenity for residents and therefore contravene materially the 'RS' zoning objective
Design

Non-compliance with 2018 Apartment Guidelines regarding storage provision, floor-to-ceiling heights (2.6m vs 2.7m required), and overall design quality, resulting in unacceptable amenity for future residents.

Sustainable Urban Housing: Design Standards for New Apartments Guidelines for Planning Authorities 2018
The proposed development is contrary to the standards for apartment development set out in the... Guidelines... would provide an unacceptable level of amenity for future residents
Traffic Sightlines

Endangers public safety due to traffic hazard on a substandard road with severely restricted sightlines, and conflicting pedestrian/vehicle movements within the confined site layout.

General planning principles / Traffic safety
It is considered that the proposed development would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard because of the traffic turning movements the proposed development would generate on a substandard road at a point where sightlines are severely restricted, and because of the conflicting movements which would occur within the site due to the confined nature of the site and the poor site layout.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.