GrantedDecided 28 April 2022Fingal County Council

Lands located to the north of the SMF premises on, Station Road, Lusk,

Planning application F22A/0107
DecisionGrant permission
Decided28 April 2022
Application typePermission
Source documents12

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons19conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Fingal County Council.
Planning permission for the construction of a two-storey commercial de

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development to be carried out in entirety in accordance with lodged plans, particulars and specifications.Compliance
  • 2Conditions of parent permissions (F15A/0565 / PL.O6F.247787 and F19A/0633) to be complied with in full. Permission expires in tandem with parent permissions.Compliance
  • 3Permission relates solely to aspects detailed in statutory public notices.Compliance
  • 4Submit revised site layout plan for long-stay bicycle parking for employees, including locker facilities and e-bike charging.Landscaping Boundary
  • 5Submit drainage design reconciliation with Reg. Ref. F19A/0633. No surface water to foul sewer. Compliance with Greater Dublin Regional Code of Practice for Drainage Works Version 6.0.Wastewater Drainage
  • 6Enter into water and/or wastewater connection agreement(s) with Irish Water prior to commencement.Water Services
  • 7Street trees planted in integrated constructed tree pits (min 16 cubic metres rooting volume, min 18-20cm girth). 7m separation from public lighting, 2.5m from man holes.Landscaping Boundary
  • 8Confirm waste streams, tonnages, and soil/stone material export/import details prior to commencement.Environment Ecology
  • 9Construction noise/management hours, BS.5228 compliance, ventilation, acoustic seals, live music control, glass bin handling restrictions, operational noise limit (5dB(A)).Construction Management
  • 10Ground floor Building 5B use restricted to public house/bar and first floor restaurant. Ground floor Building 5C units restricted to Class 1, Part 4, Schedule 2 of Planning and Development Regulations 2001. First floor Building 5C restaurant permitted. Changes require prior permission.Occupancy
  • 11Restaurants operate 0700-2300. Bar operates 0800-2330. Retail units operate 0700-2300. Monday to Sunday.Occupancy
  • 12No additional development above roof parapet level of Buildings 5B and 5C unless authorised by further permission.Design Materials

Planning a project near Lands located to the north of the SMF premises on, Station Road, Lusk,?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 77 pages of searchable text on file.

12 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 6 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

12 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →