GrantedDecided 15 July 2022Fingal County Council

19 Woodland Park, Rush, Co. Dublin, K56 E407

Planning application F22B/0126
DecisionGrant permission
Decided15 July 2022
Application typePermission
Source documents18

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons8conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Fingal County Council.
Permission is sought for single - storey extensions to side and rear o

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-314332-22Submitted 11 August 2022 / decided 27 June 2023
GrantedTo Remove Condition(s)
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-314332-22
    11 August 2022
  2. Appeal decisionTo Remove Condition(s)
    27 June 2023

Appeal documents

  • 2F6768D01D5C11EDA9064CEBBD746EEA.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 2F6768CC1D5C11EDA9064CEBBD746EEA.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 2F6768D21D5C11EDA9064CEBBD746EEA.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 2F6768CE1D5C11EDA9064CEBBD746EEA.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 4A8FEDD07C6C11ED94437066553B9052.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 2F6768CA1D5C11EDA9064CEBBD746EEA.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 723813FB2F6811ED81EC4CEBBD9E6A7E.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 3B208CDBBE7C11ED82724CEBBD9E6A7E.tifAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 9AC619EF20BB11EE82C84CEBBD9E6A7E.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • 9AC619F120BB11EE82C84CEBBD9E6A7E.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • EC97ADEC168A11EEB7E79C7BEFBB54FD.tifAppeal / OCR pendingindexed

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development to be carried out in accordance with lodged plans, particulars and specifications.Compliance
  • 2Condition removed by An Bord Pleanala on 27 June 2023.Other
  • 3Premises to be used as a single dwelling unit. Family flat not to be sold or independently let. Reverts to main house upon expiry.Occupancy
  • 4Surface water drainage must incorporate SuDS per GDSDS. Water butts required as minimum. No surface water to foul system. Comply with Greater Dublin Regional Code of Practice.Wastewater Drainage
  • 5No objects/landscaping within visibility triangle exceeding 900mm. Services/poles relocated to new boundary at developer's expense.Traffic Access
  • 6Prevent spillage/debris on adjoining roads. Developer responsible for full cost of repair for any damage to public road.Construction Management
  • 7Construction hours restricted to 8.00am-7.00pm Mon-Fri and 8.00am-2.00pm Sat. No work on Sundays or Bank Holidays.Construction Management
  • 8Pay €121.34 (updated at commencement) to Planning Authority for public infrastructure/facilities. Phasing agreed in writing prior to commencement.Development Contribution

Planning a project near 19 Woodland Park, Rush, Co. Dublin, K56 E407?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 63 pages of searchable text on file.

18 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 13 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

18 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →