GrantedDecided 11 March 2024Fingal County Council

Per Ardua, Channel Road, Rush, Co. Dublin, K56 E920

Planning application F24A/0035
DecisionGrant permission
Decided11 March 2024
Application typePermission
Source documents7

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons11conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Fingal County Council.
Planning permission is sought for;

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development to be carried out in accordance with plans, particulars and specifications lodged with the application.Compliance
  • 2Entire premises to be used as a single dwelling unit.Occupancy
  • 3Submit revised floor plans and elevational drawings omitting the first floor element and replacing it with a flat roof design with tie-ins to the pitched roof.Design Materials
  • 4All external finishes to accord with submitted details, with blue/black slate to the roof.Design Materials
  • 5All bathroom/en suite windows to be fitted and permanently maintained with obscure glass; film not acceptable.Design Materials
  • 6Surface water run-off to be discharged to a SuDS feature with high-level overflow back into existing surface water drain; soakaway to comply with BRE Digest 365, GDSDS, designed for 30-year critical duration storm event, at least 5m from any structure and 3m from any boundary. Alternative measures such as rainwater butts, permeable paving or bioretention area to be provided.Wastewater Drainage
  • 7No surface water / rainwater to discharge into the foul water system under any circumstances.Wastewater Drainage
  • 8Surface water drainage to be in compliance with the Greater Dublin Regional Code of Practice for Drainage Works, Version 6.0, FCC, April 2006.Wastewater Drainage
  • 9Construction site hours restricted to 8.00 a.m. to 7.00 p.m., Monday to Friday, and 8.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. on Saturdays. No activities on Sundays or Bank Holidays.Construction Management
  • 10Contractor to prevent spillage or deposit of clay, rubble or other debris on adjoining roads; immediate removal required at applicant's expense. Developer responsible for full cost of repair to adjoining public road.Construction Management
  • 11Developer to pay sum of €3,865.20 (updated at date of commencement of development) to the Planning Authority as a contribution towards expenditure for public infrastructure and facilities benefiting development in the area.Development Contribution

Planning a project near Per Ardua, Channel Road, Rush, Co. Dublin, K56 E920?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 34 pages of searchable text on file.

7 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 6 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

7 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →