GrantedDecided 25 September 2023Fingal County Council

"Glenmalure", in Castleknock Village Centre at Castleknock Road, Castl

Planning application FW23A/0147
Get site risk briefNearby records
DecisionGrant permission
Decided25 September 2023
Application typePermission
Source documents14

Site

Setting
urban
Site area
3.5 ha
Floor area
Not recorded
Units
Not recorded

What is on file

0refusal reasons8conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Fingal County Council.
Castleshore Investments Limited seeks permission for development, whic

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-318311-23Submitted 23 October 2023 / decided 16 April 2024
GrantedApplication Withdrawn
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference ABP-318311-23
    23 October 2023
  2. Appeal decisionApplication Withdrawn
    16 April 2024

Appeal documents

  • ABP_318311_23.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • FW23A_0147.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • FW23A_0147.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed
  • FW23A_0147.pdfAppeal / OCR pendingindexed

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.
Application ref
FW23A/0147
Received
04 September 2023
Decided
25 September 2023
FI requested
Yes
Authority
Fingal County Council
Application type
Permission
Outcome
conditional
Source status
Reasons extracted from source documents

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Development carried out in accordance with lodged plans and SAI received 29/08/23 and SAI received 04/09/23.Compliance
  • 2Terms and conditions of extant permissions FW20A/0058 and FW21A/0189 complied with in full, save for changes to plans submitted for this application.Compliance
  • 3Submit revised boundary treatment drawing omitting boundary type H along eastern boundary and continuing southern boundary treatment shared with Lidl.Landscaping Boundary
  • 4Car parking provision not to exceed 15 spaces (1 accessible, 2 motor bike, 3 EV).Traffic Access
  • 5Submit amended site layout plan with revised shared road layout, revised cycle parking (88 Long Stay + 14 Short Stay), and revised car parking.Traffic Access
  • 6Security for provision and satisfactory completion of services (roads, open spaces, car parks and drains) must be given prior to commencement.Construction Management
  • 7Financial contribution for open space shortfall to be paid prior to commencement.Development Contribution
  • 8Planning contribution to be paid prior to commencement.Development Contribution

Planning a project near "Glenmalure", in Castleknock Village Centre at Castleknock Road, Castl?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.
Get my site risk brief
Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 82 pages of searchable text on file.

Included in site brief

14 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Unlock for €39 incl. VATOr read every file with Pro
Site brief
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 8 documents.
Unlock with ProTry the research assistant

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Included in site brief

14 council documents — in the €39 site risk brief

Unlock for €39 incl. VATOr read every file with Pro
Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →