RefusedDecided 25 February 2021Galway City Council

No 91 Sandyvale Lawn, Headford Road, Galway

Planning application 20366
DecisionRefused
Decided25 February 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway City Council.
Permission for retention of development which will consist of the erection of an external metal fire escape structure to the rear of the existing dwelling at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
309776-21Submitted 22 March 2021 / decided 26 May 2021
Status not recordedREFUSED
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 309776-21
    22 March 2021
  2. Appeal decisionREFUSED
    26 May 2021
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No 91 Sandyvale Lawn, Headford Road, Galway?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →