GrantedDecided 20 February 2026Galway City Council

Unit 9F, Racecourse Business Park Ballybrit, Galway

Planning application 2560386
DecisionConditional grant
Decided20 February 2026
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway City Council.
Permission for development which consists of: to retain and complete the alterations to previously approved building under planning reference no.s 02/162 and 05/548 to accommodate the use as research, development, light industry and ancillary offices including a) retention of two mezzanine floors totalling 316m2 in additional floor area, b) retention and completion of elevation alterations to the front and rear elevations, c) permission for minor alterations to parking layout to include an accessible parking space, and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway City has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Unit 9F, Racecourse Business Park Ballybrit, Galway?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →