GrantedDecided 19 July 2017Galway County Council

Belmont,

Planning application 17746
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 July 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway County Council.
For retention for development consisting of an extension to the existing dwelling house and planning permission for development to consist of: 1. The construction of a new extension to existing dwelling house together with it's division into two separate living units. 2. The conversion of an existing granary building into 2 no. bedrooms and a storage area. 3. The demolition of existing domestic storage shed. 4. The installation of a new septic tank and percolation area together with all ancillary site works and services. (Gross floor space of works to be retained: 47.1 sqm; Gross floor space of proposed works: 188 sqm.)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Belmont,?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →