RefusedDecided 05 February 2021Galway County Council

Eskershanore,

Planning application 201832
DecisionRefused
Decided05 February 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway County Council.
For the change of use of a former skin and hide store to a storage and distribution hub (including administration area) works will include the demolition of an existing sore ("existing store building A - GFA: 1,073sqm) and associated tanks, external and internal alterations to an existing store including the construction of a ramp and dock leveler ("existing store building B - GFA 1,367sqm). Works also include for the installation of a new wastewater treatment system and the upgrade of the existing surface water management system, removal of an existing vehicular access and the creation of a new vehicular access point to the public road. The proposed development also includes appropriate landscaping as well as all associated site development works and services. The planning application is accompanied by a Natura Impact Statement. Gross floor space of any demolition; 1,073sqm

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Eskershanore,?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →