GrantedDecided 07 October 2021Galway County Council

Kilcornan,

Planning application 201876
DecisionConditional grant
Decided07 October 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Galway County Council.
For a network of walking trails. The trail network includes existing trails, the creation of new trails and the upgrade of existing trails. The proposed development also includes for the upgrade of an existing pedestrian bridge, signage, seating as well as all associated site development works and services. Within the application site there are 4 no. protected structures, Roman Catholic Church (RPS Ref 30335006), Clarenbridge Bridge (RPS Ref 30335009), Wroth-iron Gate at Kilcornan Estate (RPS Ref 30335013),and Kilcornan House (RPS Ref 30409528) A Natura Impact Statement (NIS) has been prepared in respect of the proposed development.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Galway has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Kilcornan,?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →