GrantedDecided 30 November 2017Kerry County Council

GLANNAGILLIAGH, CARAGH LAKE, KILLORGLIN

Planning application 1714
DecisionConditional grant
Decided30 November 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WHICH WILL CONSIST OF THE EXTRACTION OF AGGREGATE IN A 14.38 HECTARE EXTENSION, TO AN EXISTING QUARRY, AND REMOVAL OF SAME UNPROCESSED AGGREGATE TO THE EXISTING QUARRY FOR PROCESSING. THE PROCESSING INFRASTRUCTURE WILL REMAIN IN THE EXISTING QUARRY, AND ONLY ONE EXCAVATOR AND ONE ARTICULATED DUMP TRUCK WILL WORK IN THE EXTENSION AREA, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS PLANNING APPLICATION. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND AN APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT ACCOMPANY THIS PLANNING APPLICATION

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
300566-18Submitted 03 January 2018 / decided 18 January 2019
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near GLANNAGILLIAGH, CARAGH LAKE, KILLORGLIN?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →