GrantedDecided 09 November 2017Kerry County Council

REAR OF 23 CHARLES STREET, LISTOWEL, CO KERRY

Planning application 17918
DecisionConditional grant
Decided09 November 2017
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
(A) RETAIN FIRST FLOOR 2 BED APARTMENT AS BUILT AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS (PREVIOUS PLANNING REG. NO. 1386), (B) RETENTION PERMISSION TO RETAIN EXISTING GROUND FLOOR 1 BED APARTMENT AS BUILT AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS (PREVIOUS PLANNING REG. NO. 1386) AND FOR PLANNING PERMISSION TO INSTALL A MEANS OF ESCAPE WINDOW AT REAR OF GROUND FLOOR, (D) RETENTION PERMISSION TO RETAIN DOMESTIC SHED AS BUILT AND TO SUBDIVIDE INTO 2 DOMESTIC SHEDS (1 FOR GROUND FLOOR APT AND 1 FOR FIRST FLOOR APT) AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS, ALL THE ABOVE AT REAR OF

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near REAR OF 23 CHARLES STREET, LISTOWEL, CO KERRY?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →