GrantedDecided 31 October 2018Kerry County Council

TREANOUGHTRAGH, DOOKS, GLENBEIGH

Planning application 18874
DecisionConditional grant
Decided31 October 2018
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
RETENTION PERMISSION AND PERMISSION FOR DEVELOPMENT ON A REDUCED SITE OF 1.64 HA, (PREVIOUS PLANNING APPLICATION REG. REF 07/2821). THE SITE CURRENTLY COMPRISES A PARTIALLY COMPLETED 2 STOREY DWELLING. PERMISSION IS SOUGHT FOR THE RETENTION OF THE DEMOLITION OF THE ORIGINAL DWELLING AND THE EXISTING PARTIALLY BUILT STRUCTURE. PERMISSION IS ALSO SOUGHT FOR COMPLETION OF THE NEW DWELLING; PLAN AND ELEVATIONAL AMENDMENTS; CHANGE IN OVERALL DEVELOPMENT FLOOR AREA TO 227SQ.M AND ASSOCIATED ANCILLARY SITE AND BUILDING WORKS INCLUDING NEW WASTE WATER TREATMENT UNIT AND PERCOLATION AREA, AT SITE FORMALLY KNOWN AS BUNCAR HOUSE

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near TREANOUGHTRAGH, DOOKS, GLENBEIGH?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →