RefusedDecided 16 February 2024Kerry County Council

11 MARKET STREET, LISTOWEL, CO KERRY

Planning application 231175
DecisionRefused
Decided16 February 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
CONSTRUCT A DORMER EXTENSION TO EXISTING REAR ROOF OF EXISTING FIRST FLOOR DUPLEX/APARTMENT (APARTMENT NO. 1) AND ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS (PROTECTED STRUCTURE REF 21400228)

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
319288-24Submitted 14 March 2024 / decided 09 August 2024
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 319288-24
    14 March 2024
  2. Appeal decisionCONDITIONAL
    09 August 2024
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 11 MARKET STREET, LISTOWEL, CO KERRY?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →