RefusedDecided 19 January 2024Kerry County Council

Emlagh West, Cooleen, Dingle Co. Kerry

Planning application 2360336
DecisionRefused
Decided19 January 2024
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
(A) Retention permission to retain additional floor area of an existing dwelling house comprising additional building width, additional building height and attic accommodation. (B) Retention permission to retain an existing garden shed. (C) Planning permission to construct a single storey extension to the rear of the existing dwelling. (D) Planning permission to install additional windows comprising 1no. 2nd storey gable window to the rear, and roof lights to the front and side of the dwelling and (E) all ancillary site works related to all of the above.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
419055-24Submitted 15 February 2024 / decided 11 October 2024
Status not recordedCONDITIONAL
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Emlagh West, Cooleen, Dingle Co. Kerry?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →