GrantedDecided 11 March 2026Kerry County Council

The Parsonage, Bell Height, Kenmare

Planning application 2560038
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 March 2026
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
(a) Demolish existing dwelling house (b) construct 85 residential units consisting of 13 no terrace dwelling houses; 24 no semi detached dwelling houses; Apartment Block A containing 19 Residential units (13 x 1-Bed, 6 x 2 bed); Apartment Block B containing 7 Residential units (7 x 2-Bed); Apartment Block C containing 11 residential units (11 x 2 bed); Apartment Block D containing 11 Residential units (11 x 2-Bed), (c) construct Pre-school and all associated roads and site services. A Natura Impact Statement has been submitted with this application

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
PL-501110-KY-26Submitted 07 April 2026 / decided Not recorded
Status not recorded
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Parsonage, Bell Height, Kenmare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →