GrantedDecided 19 February 2026Kerry County Council

Forgefield House Gortagass, Kenmare, Co. Kerry

Planning application 2561217
DecisionConditional grant
Decided19 February 2026
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kerry County Council.
The development consists of (a) retention planning permission to retain the house and associated site works as constructed, (b) retention planning permission to retain the road side boundary fence and site entrance as constructed, (c) retention planning permission to retain the house, wastewater treatment system, parking area and site entrance within revised site boundaries and (d) permission to decommission the existing septic tank and permission for the installation of a new wastewater treatment tank and polishing filter to serve the existing dwelling house

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kerry has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Forgefield House Gortagass, Kenmare, Co. Kerry?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →