GrantedDecided 06 February 2018Kildare County Council

Knockaulin, Kilcullen, Co. Kildare.

Planning application 171086
DecisionConditional grant
Decided06 February 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
(a) Planning permission sought for single storey extension to rear elevation (south-west) and side elevation (north west) of existing dwelling; (b) Minor internal alterations to existing dwelling house to form a family flat; (c) Alterations to front elevation (north-east) consisting of the removal of existing window and replaced with new bay window and the reinsertion of front door and new gable window to side elevation (north west); (d) The installation of an Oakstown BAF wastewater treatment plant with soil polishing filter percolation area and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Knockaulin, Kilcullen, Co. Kildare.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →