GrantedDecided 24 May 2018Kildare County Council

Mountarmstrong, Donadea, Naas

Planning application 171401
DecisionConditional grant
Decided24 May 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
To construct a two storey, detached, 268sqm farmhouse; with new foul treatment system and raised soil polishing filter; new piers and entrance gates to new vehicular entrance; as well as all associated and ancillary site and ground works. revised by significant further information consisting of; 1. Revised house type and design to a single storey house (Area 260.1sqm) 2. Re-siting of the proposed dwelling, treatment system and percolation area on the site to a roadside location.. 3. Revised entrance gates and piers for a double dwelling and agricultural entrance

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Mountarmstrong, Donadea, Naas?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →