RefusedDecided 28 August 2017Kildare County Council

The Bank, Moyvally, Co. Kildare

Planning application 17774
DecisionRefused
Decided28 August 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
The construction of a replacement dwelling in the form of a detached 3 no. bed, single storey type dwelling (approx.. 278.635sqm), conversion of existing dwelling on site to agricultural feed store (approx. 63.5sqm), restoration of existing ruins to make safe (maintain as ruins), construction of a new agricultural building (approx. 234.82sqm) including 8 no. horse stables and a covered yard to contain dungstead (70.67sqm), installation of a new proprietary waste water treatment system together with all associated landscaping, site works and services

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
Pl 09.249297Submitted 26 September 2017 / decided Not recorded
Status not recorded
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Bank, Moyvally, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →