GrantedDecided 29 January 2019Kildare County Council

Fanoir, Naas Road, Kilcullen

Planning application 181430
DecisionConditional grant
Decided29 January 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
For: (1) Retention of the converted carport to the south as a utility room and bathroom, and new works comprising (2) an extension to the north forming a bedroom, (3) an extension to the east (forming a bedroom and 2 en-suites) and back door, (4) the incorporation of the existing store and boiler room and their covered area to form an en-suite for an existing bedroom to the north, (5) the enclosure of the existing front and side covered external open porch with doors and windows to the south and west to form a hallway/enclosed porch, (6) new roof window to the north pitch of the existing roof, (7) 4 No. roof windows to the south pitch of the existing roof, and (8) new window to the east, (9) the replacement of one front window with sliding glass patio doors and the provision of a window to the north and all associated internal and external re-arrangements and ancillary works

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Fanoir, Naas Road, Kilcullen?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →