GrantedDecided 08 March 2018Kildare County Council

Gate Lodge Number 2 St.Catherines Park, Sillechain Lane Mill Lane, Leixlip

Planning application 1834
DecisionConditional grant
Decided08 March 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house at Gate Lodge Number 2, St Catherines Park, Sillechain Lane, Mill Lane, Leixlip, Co.Kildare, the alterations and additions will include the construction of single storey extensions for kitchen/dining (26.19m2) and boiler room (3.33m2) with lean to roofs to the sides of existing ground floor layout, construction of a pitched roof first floor bedroom extension (18.48m2) replacement windows and door to front elevation, construction of a single storey stand alone garden shed/store (48.87m2) with pitched roof at the south-east of the house, the construction of a new entrance wall & gates at the front north-west boundary of the site, construction of new timber fence along south boundary, and all associated site works

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Gate Lodge Number 2 St.Catherines Park, Sillechain Lane Mill Lane, Leixlip?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →