GrantedDecided 23 June 2020Kildare County Council

Butterstream, Clane, Co.Kildare

Planning application 191406
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 June 2020
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
The enlargement of the sitting room at the front right hand side of the house with small single storey extensions, alterations to the elevation along the right hand side of the house, comprising the introduction of a high level window, and to the rear elevation with the introduction of a large sliding door, the replacement of the existing roof with a dormer roof, incorporating two dormer windows and seven skylights, and the inclusion of two bedrooms and a bathroom on the dormer floor, some internal modifications, a proposed detached garage in the rear garden, and all ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Butterstream, Clane, Co.Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →