GrantedDecided 18 July 2019Kildare County Council

Graigues, Robertstown, Co. Kildare.

Planning application 19591
DecisionConditional grant
Decided18 July 2019
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Extension of Duration of Planning File Ref. 14/365 - (a) Planning permission for 2 No. single storey type houses both with a garage/fuel store for domestic use and the installation of proprietary wastewater treatment plant and percolation area on each site. (b) Planning permission for garage/fuel store for domestic use for the existing family house. (c) Planning permission for the relocation of existing entrance and erection of new gates, piers and wing walls and all associated site works. (d) Retention permission for single storey office having a floor area of 131sqm.

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Graigues, Robertstown, Co. Kildare.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →