GrantedDecided 21 October 2019Kildare County Council

Kildare Local Services, Valetta House, Tully Road

Planning application 19983
DecisionConditional grant
Decided21 October 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Amendments to development previously approved under Planning register Reference 19/375 to provide for an increase in floor area of the proposed extension from 154.6sqm to 210.7sqm, i.e. the demolition of an existing detached single storey shed (floor area = 23.0sqm), and the erection of a single storey extension (floor area of proposed extension = 210.7sqm) to the rear of existing two storey building known as Valetta House (floor area of existing two storey building = 288.0sqm), together with all associated site works. Valetta House is a Protected Structure Ref. B22-32,

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Kildare Local Services, Valetta House, Tully Road?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →