GrantedDecided 24 June 2021Kildare County Council

Newhall, Naas, Co. Kildare

Planning application 201589
DecisionConditional grant
Decided24 June 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
(a) Retention of alterations and modifications to original single storey dwelling to include repair of and partial reconstruction of original dwelling to include new roof and "A" rated blockwork external walls. (b) Full permission for single storey extensions to front and side to include for complete remodelling of existing house and new fenestration to all elevations. (c) Full permission for new site entrance with stone walls and piers. Landscaping and all associated site development works. Revised by Significant Further Information which consists of installation of a waste water treatment system

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Newhall, Naas, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →