GrantedDecided 10 July 2020Kildare County Council

Scoil Mhicil Naofa, Mount Hawkins, Athy

Planning application 20502
DecisionConditional grant
Decided10 July 2020
Application typeEXTENSION OF DURATION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
EXTENSION OF DURATION: (14/925) a two-storey extension to the existing school including 12 No. general classrooms, 5 No. special needs classrooms, GP hall, library, administration rooms and ancillary accommodation with a total combined floor area of c. 5812sqm. The proposed development is located on the site of the existing school and includes repairs to the existing site boundary, new site exit from Convent View, new car parking and set down area, 2 No. new ballcourts, the decommissioning of 6 No. existing prefab blocks and all other associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Scoil Mhicil Naofa, Mount Hawkins, Athy?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →