GrantedDecided 26 February 2021Kildare County Council

The Gables, Ryston Athgarvan Road, Newbridge

Planning application 20655
DecisionConditional grant
Decided26 February 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
(a) RETENTION PERMISSION for green coloured steel post with PVC coated steel mesh fence having a height of 1.8m erected along the north east boundary between the applicant's private car park and the existing riverside pedestrian/cycle path and (b) PLANNING PERMISSION for a new green coloured steel post with PVC coated steel mesh fence having a height of 2m on the south east boundary with a new 2m wide public footpath connecting the existing riverside pedestrian/cycle path and the Athgarvan Road public footpath and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near The Gables, Ryston Athgarvan Road, Newbridge?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →