RefusedDecided 11 November 2021Kildare County Council

Naas Industrial Estate, Maudlins, Fishery Lane Naas

Planning application 21522
DecisionRefused
Decided11 November 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
The development consists of (A) the retention permission for the use of the site for commercial use for the parking of trucks and refrigerated container trucks, (B) the retention permission for boundary fencing, electric gates and concrete bollards to protect the adjoining stream, (C) planning permission for storage warehouse with staff facilities for commercial use having a floor area of 1121M² and surface dressing of the hard-standing yard and all associated site-works including the provision of car and truck parking spaces

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Naas Industrial Estate, Maudlins, Fishery Lane Naas?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →