GrantedDecided 23 September 2021Kildare County Council

Coole, Monasterevin, Co. Kildare

Planning application 21855
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 September 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Change of use from garage and fuel store to a one bed granny flat and 2 no. glazed porches to the rear also permission for a waste water treatment system and percolation area with all associated site works. Revised by Significant Further Information which consists of now proposing to retain the structure as an extension, comprising of a bathroom and 2 no. bedrooms not as a family flat also to retain glazed porch "A" and change of use from glazed porch "B" to a green house both to the rear also with a waste water treatment system and percolation area with all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Coole, Monasterevin, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →