RefusedDecided 11 August 2021Kildare County Council

Oughterard, Boston Hill, Straffan

Planning application 21906
DecisionRefused
Decided11 August 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
To retain existing barn structure for stabling five horses and retain alterations and excavations to original site levels, and planning permission to install a dungstead for effluent storage and a waste water treatment plant with filter bed, all at this site

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
31129721Submitted 03 September 2021 / decided Not recorded
Status not recorded
  1. Appeal submittedAppeal reference 31129721
    03 September 2021
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Oughterard, Boston Hill, Straffan?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →