RefusedDecided 22 December 2022Kildare County Council

Rathmuck, Kildare, Co. Kildare.

Planning application 221330
DecisionRefused
Decided22 December 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Sought for: (1) The construction of a contemporary dormer dwelling, foul water to on site effluent treatment system and percolation area, surface water to soakaways, double recessed vehicular entrance via existing entrance to be shared with existing family home, associated landscaping and all associated site works; and (2) To amend Condition No. 3 of planning permission Ref. No. 96/384 which relates to the sterilization of five acres and 150 linear yards of road frontage; (3) To close the existing recessed entrance serving the family home on to the L3010 road

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Rathmuck, Kildare, Co. Kildare.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →