GrantedDecided 07 March 2022Kildare County Council

36 Rathasker Heights, Kilcullen Road, Naas Co. Kildare.

Planning application 2235
DecisionConditional grant
Decided07 March 2022
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
(1) Retention of a 28m² single storey extension including 4 number "Velux" type rooflights to the side of our single storey dwelling; (2) Retention of an existing 27m² single storey shed in the rear garden; (3) Permission for a 24m² outdoor roofed seating area attached to the existing shed and (4) Permission to form a parapet wall by raising the height of the existing rear boundary wall along the length of the shed and the proposed outdoor roofed seating area and all associated ancillary site development works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 36 Rathasker Heights, Kilcullen Road, Naas Co. Kildare.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →