GrantedDecided 22 November 2022Kildare County Council

Green Lane, Easton, Leixlip

Planning application 22879
DecisionConditional grant
Decided22 November 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
A four-storey apartment building containing a total of 24 No. apartments comprising of 4 No. 1 bedroom, 16 No. 2 bedroom, and 4 No. 3 bedroom apartments. The foregoing provides for modifications to the previously permitted site layout consisting of the omission of 4 No. car parking spaces to allow fire tender circulation around the proposed development. The proposed development is in place of the previously permitted (but not commenced) five-storey apartment building containing 28 No. units and amends the car parking layout permitted under ABP 311140-21/Kildare County Council Ref. 21/732

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Green Lane, Easton, Leixlip?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →