GrantedDecided 06 February 2024Kildare County Council

4 Glen Easton Grove, Leixlip, Co. Kildare

Planning application 231046
DecisionConditional grant
Decided06 February 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Permission is sought for the removal of existing lower tiled roof to front of dwelling & construct a new two storey extension with new tiled roof structure to match existing. New windows in existing side gable wall. Extend part of main tiled ridge & tiled roof to match existing with a ventilated rooflight in side hipped tiled roof. New dormer roof structure in the existing rear tiled roof. Conversion of the existing attic area into a new non-habitable attic area. Internal alterations. External finishes to match existing & associate site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 4 Glen Easton Grove, Leixlip, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →