GrantedDecided 20 February 2024Kildare County Council

39 Forest Park, Leixlip, Co. Kildare

Planning application 231061
DecisionConditional grant
Decided20 February 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
A) the construction of a single storey extension on the ground floor to the side and rear that will include the demolition and reconstruction of the existing boundary wall; b) a new pedestrian access gate to the side of the property in the new boundary wall; c) the demolition and reconstruction of the existing shed; d) raising the existing boundary wall at the rear of the property; e) a new front door canopy and; f) the conversion of the attic into a non-habitable room with a proposed dormer window to the rear. All together with all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near 39 Forest Park, Leixlip, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →