GrantedDecided 23 November 2023Kildare County Council

Carraghowen House, Leixlip Gate, Leixlip

Planning application 23940
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 November 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
Alterations and extensions to the existing house including: a single story extension to the west elevation, two storey extensions to the north and east elevations, façade changes to all elevations, a new ground floor canopy and new solar panels to the south elevation, internal alterations to the ground and first floors, and all associated site works. Planning permission was previously granted for the decommissioning of the existing septic tank, with a new connection to the existing foul sewer, and a new site entrance: refer to Reg Ref. 22/1444

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Carraghowen House, Leixlip Gate, Leixlip?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →