GrantedDecided 04 October 2024Kildare County Council

Mylerstown Two Mile House, Naas, Co. Kildare

Planning application 2460320
DecisionConditional grant
Decided04 October 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
The demolition of elements of the existing dwelling and adjoining structure, a new single storey extension to the sides and rear of the existing dwelling, internal and external works to the existing dwelling including changes to the front elevation, opening of a new vehicular entrance to the site, redefining of the site boundaries to include works to the roadside boundary and junction as designed by KCC roads engineer and new wastewater treatment system and polishing filter together with all associated site development works. Revised by Significant Further Information which consists of changes to the design including façade and roof changes to retain as much of the original cottage as possible, as requested in the FI, changes to the architectural style and materials of the dwelling and a reduced footprint of the dwelling.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Mylerstown Two Mile House, Naas, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →