RefusedDecided 30 January 2025Kildare County Council

Brownstown Great, The Curragh, Co. Kildare

Planning application 2461268
DecisionRefused
Decided30 January 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
For the demolition of the existing family dwelling (now derelict) and the construction of two no. replacement dwelling houses. House No. 1 will comprise of an L-shaped one and a half storey dwelling with a single storey section, with ancillary garage and alterations to the existing entrance onto Brownstown Manor, and all ancillary site works. House No. 2 will comprise of a T- shaped one and a half storey dwelling with a single storey section, with ancillary outbuilding and alterations to the existing entrance onto Suncroft Road, and all ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Brownstown Great, The Curragh, Co. Kildare?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →