GrantedDecided 14 May 2025Kildare County Council

Broadleas Commons, Ballymore Eustace, Co. Kildare.

Planning application 2560309
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 May 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
For to construct the following: An extension to the rear of our house built on two levels. The first section is to be on the same level as our house while the second section is to be 1.70 m above the first due to the slope of the existing ground to the rear. The existing house has a floor area of 119.27 sq.m and the proposed extension will add a further 124 sq.m. To carry out alterations to the internal layout which increases our bedrooms from three to four. To remove the door and screen to the front left side of our house when viewed from the public road and replace it with a 1.2 m window only. To decommission the existing septic tank to the rear and replace it with a Proprietary Wastewater Treatment Unit with a Soil Polishing Filter to the front of the house. All associated ground works in connection with the above

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Broadleas Commons, Ballymore Eustace, Co. Kildare.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →