GrantedDecided 05 September 2025Kildare County Council

No. 09 Leinster Wood, Carton Demesne, Maynooth

Planning application 2560791
DecisionConditional grant
Decided05 September 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kildare County Council.
For (a) single storey extensions to the north-east side and south-west side of the existing dwelling; (b) a new porch over the front door to the south-west; (c) the replacement of an existing velux rooflight with a dormer window on the north-eastern roof slope; (d) minor alternations to existing elevations; (e) all associated site and landscaping works. The proposed development is in the vicinity of Carton House, associated outhouses, stables and yards which are Protected Structures. No works are proposed which directly affect these structures

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kildare has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No. 09 Leinster Wood, Carton Demesne, Maynooth?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →