GrantedDecided 14 August 2018Kilkenny County Council

Oak Lodge, Talbots Inch Village, Kilkenny

Planning application 18417
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 August 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
For development at this site. The development will consist/consists of (i) Internal alterations to existing house (a protected structure) to include maintenance and upgrade work to existing windows, demolition of internal walls, insertion of a new staircase, demolition of non-original porch and gable wall to non-original extension (ii) Single Storey Extension of 82m2. Eaves height 2.85m - 3.74m (iii) Replacement 1 no. vehicular and 1 no. pedestrian gates to East Boundary (iv) New avenue and set of vehicular gates to South boundary (v) Ancillary site works at

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Oak Lodge, Talbots Inch Village, Kilkenny?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →