GrantedDecided 15 February 2021Kilkenny County Council

Ballymountain, Slieverue, Co. Kilkenny

Planning application 20485
DecisionConditional grant
Decided15 February 2021
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
For 1. Planning retention permission for an existing Storage Bay. 2. Planning permission for erection of 3 new Storage Bays for Construction & Demolition materials including soil, stone, concrete, tarmacadam, & topsoil 3. Permission for extension to parking area & new parking layout for the entire site to include for storage area for heavy trucks, trailers, JCB's, & machinery. 4. Permission for Compound area for the storage of Construction materials, Pipes, Ducting, Conc. manhole rings, Safety barriers & cones etc. 5. Percolation for surface water & ancillary works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Ballymountain, Slieverue, Co. Kilkenny?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →