GrantedDecided 11 November 2021Kilkenny County Council

Rosbercon Parish Sports Grounds, Raheen (Rosbercon), New Ross

Planning application 21123
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 November 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
(A) PERMISSION for development to construct a walking track to perimeter of the grounds with associated artificial street lighting and Floodlighting to existing pitches (B) RETENTION of existing floodlighting with replacement to LED light fittings, and 3 no. storage containers, one of the storage containers to be relocated on site (C) RETENTION of roadside signpost and placing of new advertisement location sign to it for 'St Joseph's Athletics Club' along with all associated site and development works at their site

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Rosbercon Parish Sports Grounds, Raheen (Rosbercon), New Ross?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →