GrantedDecided 25 August 2022Kilkenny County Council

Site No 25 Foxes Covert, Mount Juliet, Thomastown

Planning application 22432
DecisionConditional grant
Decided25 August 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
For change of house type (two storey with Living on upper floor) - previous Permission Ref No. 21352, with addition of a full-length balcony to east elevation, single storey garage, buggy bay, gazebo and some alterations to landscaping and associated site works at Site No 25, Foxe's Covert (identified in previous application as Site No 11, The Inch). There are a number of structures on the Record of Protected Structures at Mount Juliet Estate (including Refs. C367; D24, C1021, C1022, C1023). No works are proposed to these structures

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Site No 25 Foxes Covert, Mount Juliet, Thomastown?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →