GrantedDecided 23 January 2025Kilkenny County Council

Resica Falls, Castle Gardens, Kilkenny

Planning application 2460570
DecisionConditional grant
Decided23 January 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
For the construction and remodeling of a single storey flat roofed side and rear extension to the existing dwelling incorporating; new kitchen rear extension (16.4m² back of house), dining area and utility areas within the outline of the existing garage including a new flat roof construction instead of existing pitched roof, external insulation to all elevations, demolition of existing chimney to underside of roof structure, new photovoltaic panels to the back elevation, new windows & sills throughout, hard and soft landscaping and all associated ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Resica Falls, Castle Gardens, Kilkenny?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →