GrantedDecided 11 December 2025Kilkenny County Council

Moat Street and the Square, Ballyragget, Co Kilkenny

Planning application 2560424
DecisionConditional grant
Decided11 December 2025
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Kilkenny County Council.
Is sought for works to two adjacent structures. The development consists of the following: (a) the refurbishment, a two storey extension to the rear, and modifications to the existing two storey derelict dwelling and its elevation, fronting Moat Street and associated site works. (b) The refurbishment and modification of the existing single storey derelict dwelling and its elevation fronting to Moat Street and the Square including the raising of the roof and eaves level to facilitate a new first floor area and associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Kilkenny has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Moat Street and the Square, Ballyragget, Co Kilkenny?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →