GrantedDecided 25 January 2018Limerick County Council

No. 13 Pery Square, Limerick.

Planning application 171089
DecisionConditional grant
Decided25 January 2018
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
1. demolition of later edition structure to rear and its replacement with a new extension to accommodate sanitary and utility rooms. 2. the provision of a small single storey extension for use as an en-suite at lower ground floor level. 3. repairs/replacement of windows - altering the frames to insert double glazed incorporating the conservation of any original surviving panes of glass. 4. the conversion of the front bedroom at first floor level to a bathroom and all associated pipe work. 5. the insertion of underfloor heating at lower ground floor level, and a new traditional heating system to the upper floor levels. 6. complete dry lining of the internal faces of all external walls (with a breathable fermacell board) - at lower ground floor level only. No. 13 Pery Square is a recorded Protected structure. (RPS 207 & NIAH or Monument Ref. No: 21517281)

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No. 13 Pery Square, Limerick.?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →