GrantedDecided 29 July 2021Limerick County Council

Roxboro Petrol Filling Station, Roxboro Road, Limerick

Planning application 201206
DecisionConditional grant
Decided29 July 2021
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Redevelopment of the existing Roxboro Petrol Filling Station consisting of: demolition of existing forecourt building(shop unit and offices) and storage shed/container; construction of a new replacement petrol filling station forecourt building measuring 254sqm to include shop/deli, staff facilities, offices and storage; provision of replacement brush wash slab and remote dispenser; relocation of waste compactors; bicycle and car parking; retention and enhancement of site boundaries and all associated site development and infrastructure works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Roxboro Petrol Filling Station, Roxboro Road, Limerick?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →