GrantedDecided 02 February 2022Limerick County Council

Church Street, Incharourke, Askeaton Co. Limerick

Planning application 211661
DecisionConditional grant
Decided02 February 2022
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Limerick County Council.
Increase the AstroTurf area to 60m X 30m, to extend existing hurling wall to 45m long, 2.4m high rebound fencing with a 2.4m high ball stop net to surround proposed astro turf, the provision of flood lights to the proposed astro turf from that permitted under planning reference 20/698 all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Limerick has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Church Street, Incharourke, Askeaton Co. Limerick?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €39 incl. VAT, PDF by email.Searching the records is free. A one-off brief for this site is €39, and Pro at €19/month adds full document access and the planning AI for people tracking more than one site.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

1 council document — in the €39 site risk brief

Site brief

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →